He admires them because each of them seems to have the one thing he does not have — the freedom to choose his own day.
Look at what he notices about each person. He never once mentions money, or comfort, or how easy the work is.
| The person | What the child admires | What the child cannot do |
|---|---|---|
| The hawker | No road he must take, no place he must reach, no time to be home | He must reach school by ten, by the same lane |
| The gardener | Does what he likes with his spade; may get dirty, hot or wet; nobody scolds him | He is told to keep clean and stay out of sun and rain |
| The watchman | Walks the streets all night with a lantern | He is sent to bed as soon as it gets dark |
There is a second reason too. A child is curious. All three of these people work outdoors, where things happen — a street full of people, a garden full of earth, a dark lane at night. Compared with sitting at a desk, that looks like an adventure.
Sample answer: The speaker admires the hawker, the gardener and the watchman because their days look free to him. Nobody hurries the hawker or tells him which road to take. Nobody scolds the gardener for getting dust on his clothes. The watchman is out in the street at the very hour when the speaker is sent to bed. The speaker’s own day is decided for him — school at ten, home at four, bed at dark. So he looks at these three people and thinks how good it would be to be his own master. He is admiring their freedom, and he does not yet know how hard each of these jobs really is. The hawker walks all day to earn what he earns, the gardener works in the hot sun and the rain, and the watchman stays awake all night so that others can sleep safely. Every one of these is real work, done well, and the poem does not say any of it is easy — the child simply has not seen that part yet.