Q1.
So far, we have been listing all the factors to find the HCF. This can become cumbersome for numbers with many factors, as you would have observed for the numbers 30 and 50, and 28 and 42. Sometimes, we may also miss some factors which can lead to errors. Can this process be simplified? Can it be made more reliable?
Answer
Yes — prime factorisation simplifies it and makes it reliable.
Listing factors has two weaknesses. It is long for numbers such as 360 or 840, and it is easy to miss one.
Listing method: 30 → 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 10, 15, 30
50 → 1, 2, 5, 10, 25, 50
Compare the two lists, pick the largest match = 10
Prime method: 30 = 2 × 3 × 5, 50 = 2 × 5 × 5
Common primes: one 2 and one 5
HCF = 2 × 5 = 10
50 → 1, 2, 5, 10, 25, 50
Compare the two lists, pick the largest match = 10
Prime method: 30 = 2 × 3 × 5, 50 = 2 × 5 × 5
Common primes: one 2 and one 5
HCF = 2 × 5 = 10
Why it happens: a number has many factors but only one prime factorisation. Working with the primes means working with a short, fixed list instead of a long one you must build yourself — so there is nothing to miss.