Q1.
After observing a few prime factorisations, Anshu claims “The larger a number is, the longer its prime factorisation will be”. What do you think of Anshu’s claim?
Answer
Anshu's claim is false. One counterexample is enough to settle it.
96 = 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 3 → 6 prime factors
121 = 11 × 11 → 2 prime factors
121 is the larger number, but its factorisation is shorter
121 = 11 × 11 → 2 prime factors
121 is the larger number, but its factorisation is shorter
More counterexamples: 128 = 2⁷ has seven prime factors, while the much larger 1009 is prime and has just one.
Why it happens: the length of a prime factorisation depends on how small the primes are, not on how big the number is. A number built from many 2s grows slowly and collects a long factorisation. A number that is a product of two large primes is huge but has only two factors in its list.
Did you know? A claim made without proof is called a conjecture. Anshu's claim is a conjecture, and we disproved it by finding a counterexample — a single case where it fails. To prove a conjecture true you must cover every case; to prove it false one example is enough.