NCERT Solutions for Class 7th Social Science Chapter 15 Chapter opening — The Big Questions

Book page 61 Updated on2026-09-19

Q1.
What major changes characterised this period?
Answer

The biggest change is that one large empire is replaced by many strong regional kingdoms. The chapter says it plainly: “You don’t see large empires in India now, but many strong kingdoms.” Around that single change, five more follow.

The changeWhat it looked like on the ground
1. From one empire to many kingdomsAfter the Guptas, power spread out — Puṣhyabhūtis, Pālas, Gurjara-Pratīhāras, Rāṣhṭrakūṭas, Chālukyas, Pallavas, Pāṇḍyas, Cheras, Cholas, Kārkoṭas, Varmans and more. A few grew into empires, but “rarely managed to cover a large part of India or to last more than a couple of centuries.”
2. Rule through sāmantasKings ruled their core region directly and the rest through subordinate rulers. This made large kingdoms possible — and made them fragile, because a sāmanta could rebel.
3. Land grants spread everywhereThe system begun under the Guptas “expanded greatly”, creating a new class of landholders, bringing uncultivated land under the plough, and building tanks and wells.
4. Regional languages rise beside SanskritTamil, Kannada, Telugu and Prakrit flourish; inscriptions begin to use Sanskrit and the local language together.
5. Bhakti spreads through every layer of societyFrom about 650 CE in the Tamil south, through the 12 Ālvārs and 63 Nāyanmārs, devotion “cutting across gender and social divisions” reshaped Indian society and literature.
6. Society itself gets more complexJātis multiplied; tribes, migrants and occupational groups were absorbed into the varṇa-jāti system, which “varied widely across regions”.
Why it happens: when a very large empire breaks up, the wealth and talent that used to flow to one capital now stays in the regions. So instead of one Pāṭaliputra you get Kannauj, Mānyakheṭa, Vātāpi, Kānchī, Tanjāvūr and Madurai, each with its own poets, temples and script. That is exactly why this period looks poor in politics and rich in culture at the same time.
Tip: the chapter warns you against calling this a dark age. Its own verdict is: “Far from being a historical void, it witnessed the dynamic integration of new social and political groups.”
Q2.
How did the political, cultural, and religious developments shape India during this period?
Answer

Politically India split into regions; culturally and religiously those same regions grew richer, and India stayed one. The three developments worked on each other.

Political → cultural. Rival kings competed not only with armies but with art. Krishna I had the Kailaśhanātha temple carved out of a hillside at Ellora — “not a construction but a gigantic sculpture”. Narasimhavarman I’s Māmallapuram was cut from living rock. Dharmapāla founded Vikramaśhilā; the Pālas kept Nālandā going. The chapter states the rule directly: “We should not imagine that the kings of such dynasties were constantly at war. In fact, they found time and resources to create wonders.”

Political → linguistic. A regional king needed his own court literature. So Kannada grew under the Rāṣhṭrakūṭas (Amoghavarṣha himself wrote in it), Telugu and Kannada under the Eastern Chālukyas, Tamil and Sanskrit together under the Pallavas and Cholas.

Religious → social. Rulers patronised Hindu, Buddhist and Jain schools of thought “regardless of their own inclinations”. The Rāṣhṭrakūṭas did all three. Harṣha gave to “Buddhists, Brahmins, and the poor”. Amoghavarṣha was drawn to Jainism yet patronised Hindu temples. This produced a cultural pluralism rather than religious wars.

Religious → cultural. The Purāṇas absorbed local deities and regional myths into pan-Indian worship of Śhiva, Viṣhṇu, Kṛiṣhṇa and the devīs. Tantric schools appeared around the 6th century. Bhakti then carried devotion into every home in the local language.

Why India held together anyway: the kings were rivals, but they shared a common frame — the same Sanskrit learning, the same pilgrimage map, the same ideas of dharma and karma, the same trade routes. A merchant from Bengal and a poet from Kanchipuram were in different kingdoms but not in different worlds. That is what the chapter means by “different in each region, yet all part of one India”.
Q3.
What was the impact of foreign invasions and interactions on Indian society and polity during this period?
Answer

The invasions changed India far less than they changed the invaders — until the Arabs arrived, when the pattern began to shift. The chapter tells two very different stories.

1. The Hūṇas — defeat, then absorption. Two Hūṇa leaders pushed deep into the Ganga plains in the early 6th century and were defeated by the kings of the Aulikara dynasty, whose capital was Daśhapura (modern Mandsaur). Within a century they had vanished as a separate people: “many served as soldiers, others took up roles in local administrations”, one even sat on a temple’s administration council (goṣhṭhika). They wrote in Sanskrit and Prakrit, took Gupta-style titles, copied Gupta coin designs and used Lakṣhmī, Viṣhṇu and Śhiva on their money.

2. The Arabs — raids, one conquest, then a long stalemate. Naval raids hit Thānā, Bhārukachchha and Debal in 637 without lasting gain. In 712 Muhammad bin Qasim conquered Sindh and killed King Dāhar. But within two years of Qasim’s death, Indian chiefs rebelled and won back most of the territory. Nāgabhaṭa I “crushed the large army of the powerful Mlechchha king”; Lalitāditya of Kashmir beat an Arab chief three times. The geographer al-Istakhri observed that after three centuries of unremitting effort the Arab dominion in India was limited to two petty states in Sindh and Punjab.

The impact, point by point

  • On polity: the northwestern frontier stayed a permanent concern, and defending it became a source of prestige — the Gurjara-Pratīhāras “gained fame for pushing back Arab invasions”.
  • On society: foreign groups were absorbed. The Hūṇas disappeared into the varṇa-jāti system; some communities, such as foreign traders, “remained as outsiders”.
  • On religion: in Sindh the Arabs eventually changed policy — Hindus and Buddhists were allowed to rebuild temples and continue their worship, and temple priests kept their share of revenue. Elsewhere in the world Arab conquest often replaced local institutions; in Sindh its impact was “limited”.
  • On knowledge — the interaction that mattered most: in the 9th century Sanskrit texts of mathematics, astronomy and medicine were translated into Arabic at Baghdad. The Arabs took India’s decimal system and the zero, and passed them to Europe, where they became known as ‘Arabic numerals’.
Did you know? The traffic was not one-way and it was much older than any invasion. India and Arabia had traded with the monsoon winds for centuries — the English word monsoon comes from the Arabic mawsim, ‘season’.
Was this helpful?