NCERT Solutions Poorvi Chapter 2 A Tale of Valour: Major Somnath Sharma and the Battle of Badgam — Let us think and reflect

Book page 59 to 61 Updated on2026-09-05

Q1.
Read the given extract and answer the question that follows. “Vastly outnumbered and facing devastating fire, Major Somnath Sharma and his men stood resolute. The air was thick with the sound of gunfire and the cries of battle, but Major Somnath Sharma's voice cut through the chaos, urging his men to fight with tenacity and valour. Despite heavy casualties and his own injuries, Major Somnath Sharma displayed unparalleled bravery. He moved fearlessly through the battlefield, directing fire, filling magazines for his gunners, and encouraging his men to hold their ground.” — What can be inferred about the conditions from the line: ‘The air was thick with gunfire...’ A. The gunshots had stopped for a while. B. There was intense fighting on the battlefield. C. The invaders were retreating from the fight. D. The Indian soldiers had achieved victory.
Answer

B. There was intense fighting on the battlefield.

Why: “thick” is normally used of smoke, fog or a crowd — of something so dense that you cannot see or move through it. Applying it to sound is a deliberate transfer: the writer makes noise behave like fog. So the line does not merely say that guns were firing; it says the firing was continuous enough to fill the air. Options A, C and D all describe a lull or a stopping, which is the opposite of what “thick” implies.
Tip: in an inference question, test each option against a single word of the extract. Here the whole answer sits in the word “thick”.
Q2.
Complete the sentence with a suitable reason. Despite heavy casualties, Major Somnath Sharma continued to lead his men because ________.
Answer

because he knew that his own visible presence was the one thing keeping ninety heavily outnumbered men in their positions, and that every hour they held Badgam bought time for reinforcements to reach Srinagar.

Why this is the right kind of reason: the extract does not say he stayed because he was fearless by nature. It lists what he actually did — “directing fire, filling magazines for his gunners, and encouraging his men”. Those are three jobs a company commander does not normally do himself; he does them only when the company is close to breaking. His reason, therefore, was practical as much as moral: leadership was the resource his men had run short of, and he supplied it.
Another acceptable completion: “… because he had told his seniors that his men would not go into action without him, and he would not abandon them once they were in it.”
Q3.
Select the correct option for both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) given below: (A): Major Somnath Sharma moved fearlessly through the battlefield, even though he was injured. (R): He believed his courage was important to motivate the soldiers. A. Both (A) and (R) are true, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A). B. Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A). C. (A) is true, but (R) is false. D. (A) is false, but (R) is true.
Answer

A. Both (A) and (R) are true, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A).

Why: (A) is stated almost word for word in the extract — “Despite heavy casualties and his own injuries… He moved fearlessly through the battlefield.” (R) is supported by the same sentence, which ends with “encouraging his men to hold their ground”: encouragement is exactly what he was moving about in order to give. Since the reason names the purpose of the action described in the assertion, it explains it, and not merely accompanies it. So option A, not B.
How to tell A from B: ask “does R answer the question why did A happen?” If yes, choose A. If both are true but R answers some other question, choose B.
Q4.
Fill in the blank with the correct word from those given in the brackets: Major Somnath Sharma was filling magazines, and encouraging his men to hold their ground despite ________. (injuries/worry)
Answer

injuries

The full sentence: Major Somnath Sharma was filling magazines, and encouraging his men to hold their ground despite injuries.

Why not “worry”: the extract says “Despite heavy casualties and his own injuries” — the word is supplied by the text itself. Remember also that he had gone into Srinagar with his left hand already in plaster, so “injuries” is doubly accurate.
Q5.
Read the given extract and answer the question that follows. “Born on 31 January 1923, in the picturesque town of Dadh in Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, Somnath Sharma belonged to a family with a rich military legacy. His father, Major General Amar Nath Sharma, had served the nation with distinction, and young Somnath was deeply inspired by the valorous tales of the Mahabharata, imparted to him by his grandfather.” — What can be inferred about Somnath Sharma's early influences on his career? A. He was primarily influenced by his father's achievements in the military. B. His inspiration came solely from the tales of the Mahabharata. C. His family and heritage inspired his bravery and sense of duty. D. He decided to join the military out of necessity rather than passion.
Answer

C. His family and heritage inspired his bravery and sense of duty.

Why: the extract names two influences and both come from inside the family — his father's distinguished service, and the Mahabharata stories his grandfather told him. Options A and B each pick only one of the two and add the words “primarily” and “solely”, which the extract does not support. D contradicts the extract altogether: nothing here suggests necessity.
Tip: in inference options, watch the absolute words — solely, primarily, only, always. They are the commonest way a wrong option is made out of a true fact.
Q6.
Identify whether the following statement is true or false: Somnath Sharma belonged to a wealthy family.
Answer

False.

Why: the extract says he belonged to “a family with a rich military legacy”. The word “rich” here modifies legacy, not family, and a legacy is what is handed down — experiences, values and traditions, as the chapter's own glossary explains. The text tells us his family was distinguished in service; it says nothing at all about money.
Check it yourself: replace “rich” with “long”. “A family with a long military legacy” means exactly the same thing — which proves that “rich” was never about wealth.
Q7.
What does the phrase ‘served the nation with distinction’ tell us about Major General Amar Nath Sharma? (He performed his duties with exceptional dedication, honour, and excellence./He was highly respected for his contributions to the country.)
Answer

It tells us that he performed his duties with exceptional dedication, honour, and excellence.

Why this option and not the other: “with distinction” describes the manner of the service itself — how well he did it. Being “highly respected” is a consequence of serving with distinction, not its meaning. The question asks what the phrase tells us about the man, so the answer should be about his performance, not about other people's opinion of him.
Try this: the same phrase is used of students — “she passed with distinction” means she did unusually well, not that everyone admired her.
Q8.
Replace the underlined phrase with a word from the extract that has a similar meaning. My family and I visited a popular hill station and stayed in an old but visually charming house surrounded by trees.
Answer

The word from the extract is picturesque.

My family and I visited a popular hill station and stayed in an old but picturesque house surrounded by trees.
Why it fits: picturesque literally means “like a picture” — pretty enough to be painted. In the extract it describes the town of Dadh; in this sentence it describes an old house among trees. Both are places whose charm is in how they look, which is exactly what “visually charming” means.
Q9.
‘Major Somnath's legacy of courage and devotion to the nation remains forever alive, forever alive…’ What is the significance of the repetition in this line?
Answer

The repetition turns a statement into an echo, and an echo is the exact image the chapter has been building.

  • Said once, “remains forever alive” is a claim. Said twice, with the trailing dots, it stops sounding like prose and starts sounding like a refrain — like the patriotic song quoted just above it on the same page.
  • The chapter later says the day “ended with echoes of courage that served as an inspiration for generations to come”. Repeating the phrase makes the sentence do what it describes: the words come back a second time the way his memory comes back to each new generation.
  • The ellipsis (…) leaves the second repetition unfinished, so it fades rather than stops — suggesting that the repeating has not ended, only moved out of earshot.
Why it matters: this is a small lesson in how non-fiction borrows from poetry. The writer could have written “his legacy is permanent”. Instead the form of the sentence carries the meaning, and the reader feels the permanence instead of being told about it.
Q10.
Why do you think Major Somnath's leadership was critical during the Battle of Badgam?
Answer

Because at Badgam almost every advantage lay with the enemy, and leadership was the only one left on the Indian side. Four decisions show this.

  1. He read the battle correctly. When the first attack came, he “correctly visualised that the first attack was just a distraction” — and the main attack did then come from another side. Ninety men in the wrong position would have been finished at once.
  2. He called for and guided air support. He “bravely laid out ground panels to guide the aircraft towards their target”, which meant exposing himself in the open to mark the target. The strikes hit the invaders.
  3. He kept the company firing. He moved through the position “directing fire, filling magazines for his gunners” — that is, he kept the guns supplied by hand when the company was running out of ammunition.
  4. He refused to withdraw. Ordered to pull back, he replied that he would fight “to the last man and the last round”, because a withdrawal from Badgam would have opened the higher ground above the airfield.
The proof of the leadership is what happened after he died. His men held the position for over six more hours without him. Leadership that stops working the moment the leader falls is only supervision; his had already been absorbed by the company.
Q11.
What were Major Somnath's last words? What do they reflect about his sense of duty?
Answer

His last recorded words were the message he sent to Brigade headquarters when he was told to pull back:

“The enemy is only 50 yards from us. We are heavily outnumbered.
We are under devastating fire. I shall not withdraw an inch but will
fight to the last man and the last round.”

They reflect a sense of duty that is clear-eyed rather than reckless, and this shows in the way the message is built.

  • The first three sentences are pure fact — distance, numbers, volume of fire. He does not soften the report to make his decision look easier. He is telling headquarters exactly how bad the position is.
  • Only the last sentence states the decision. Placed after the facts, it reads as a considered choice made with full knowledge, not as bravado.
  • “I shall not withdraw an inch” fixes duty to a measurable thing, and “to the last man and the last round” defines exactly when the duty would end — when there is no one left to fight and nothing left to fight with.
Note: he was killed minutes later, crouched in a trench helping a machine gunner load his weapon — which is to say, doing precisely what the message had promised.
Q12.
What might have been the outcome of the Battle of Badgam if Major Somnath and his company had not held their ground?
Answer

Very probably the loss of Srinagar, and with it the Valley. The chapter gives enough detail to trace the chain.

  1. Badgam would have fallen first. It lay “less than 5 kilometres away from the Srinagar airfield” and “was on a higher altitude than the airfield”. Whoever held Badgam looked down on the airfield.
  2. The airfield would have followed. The invaders' stated aim was “to capture the Srinagar airfield and its surrounding areas”.
  3. Reinforcement would have stopped. The land route through Pathankot “was not in a good condition”, so troops and supplies were arriving by air. Lose the airfield and the only working door into the Valley closes.
  4. The larger plan might have succeeded — “to engineer a revolt in Kashmir, overthrow the government, and capture the territory”, and to control the mountain passes, peaks and rivers.
What actually happened instead: D Company's resistance “provided time for reinforcements to arrive, including flying in soldiers from the Punjab regiment to Srinagar”, and the invaders lost more than 300 men. The chapter's own judgement is that “D Company's sacrifice and Major Somnath's leadership saved Srinagar for India”.
Tip: answer a “what if” question by naming the links in the chain, not by predicting a single dramatic result. The marks are in the reasoning.
Q13.
Why do you think Major Somnath's story continues to inspire soldiers and civilians today?
Answer

Because the story is about a series of choices, and choices are something any reader can recognise, whereas battles are not.

  • He chose to go. His left hand was in plaster; he could have stayed behind honourably. He said instead, “I know my men better than anyone else, and if they are going into action, they are not going in without me.”
  • He chose to tell the truth. His last signal reported the hopelessness of the position before announcing his decision — an honesty that costs more than courage.
  • He chose the smaller task. He died filling a machine gun for a gunner: a major doing a rifleman's job because that was what the moment needed.
  • He was twenty-four. The chapter says so plainly, and that fact makes the story reachable for a school student in a way that a distant hero's would not be.
And the country keeps the story in circulation. His name is on the Honour Wall of the National War Memorial, the PVC citation is on record, and 4 KUMAON carries the Battle Honour “Srinagar”. A memory survives because institutions and songs, not only feelings, carry it forward — which is exactly the point the chapter's opening paragraph makes.
Q14.
How can the values demonstrated by Major Somnath Sharma—courage, duty, and self-sacrifice—be applied in our daily lives?
Answer

By separating the value from the battlefield. None of us will be asked to hold Badgam; all of us are asked, most weeks, to do a smaller version of what he did.

ValueWhat it looked like at BadgamWhat it can look like for us
CourageLaying out ground panels in the open, under fireSpeaking up when a classmate is being bullied or blamed unfairly, even when it is easier to look away
DutyRefusing to withdraw an inch from the position he was givenFinishing the work you agreed to do — the group project, the school duty, the promise to a younger sibling
Self-sacrificeFilling magazines for his gunners instead of taking coverGiving up time, comfort or credit so that the group's work succeeds
TruthfulnessReporting the position exactly before decidingAdmitting a mistake before it grows, instead of covering it
Why this translation is fair, and not an exaggeration: self-sacrifice does not mean dying. It means putting the common task above your own convenience — and that is the same act whether the cost is your life or your afternoon.
Was this helpful? Report an error