NCERT Solutions Exploring Society: India and Beyond Chapter 7 Social and cultural influences — LET’S EXPLORE

Book page 169 Updated on2026-09-05

Q1.
Let’s do a small experiment. Make a list of 10 working adults in your family and neighbourhood. Ask them to describe the culture at their workplace. Share notes with your classmates. What did you discover? What are some adjectives that occur more frequently?
Answer

How to run it properly. Ten people is a small sample, so make it a varied one — try to include a shopkeeper, a factory or construction worker, a teacher, a driver, an office employee, someone self-employed, and at least four women. Ask the same three open questions to everyone, and write down their own words:

  1. Describe your workplace in three words.
  2. What happens there if someone makes a mistake?
  3. Does anyone teach you anything new at work? Who, and how?

Then pool the class’s lists and simply count how often each adjective appears. That count is your finding.

Adjectives that usually come up oftenWhat they tell you about human capital
busy, hard-working, punctual, disciplinedA culture of hard work — the first quality the chapter lists
supportive, friendly, like a familySkills get passed on informally; new workers learn faster
strict, target-driven, pressured, tiringOutput may be high, but ill health and mistakes rise — the healthcare argument of page 168 in reverse
safe / unsafe, clean / dirtyDirectly the employer’s responsibility for “fair compensation and working conditions” (page 181)
Sample answer: “Across our class’s 300 responses, the commonest words were busy, hard-working and helpful. Only a few people said they were formally trained at work; most said they had learnt by watching a senior. Almost nobody used the word improvement. We concluded that our neighbourhood has a strong culture of effort but a weak culture of deliberate, continuous improvement.”
Why the chapter asks this: to make the abstract idea of a work culture measurable. Japan’s kaizen — ‘continuous improvement’, applied since the mid-1940s — and the German habit of punctuality, attention to detail and quality are not laws or machines. They are just what large numbers of ordinary workers do every day, which is precisely what your ten interviews measure. If the word improvement never appears in your survey, that is a real and useful discovery about the human capital around you.
Q2.
In the Chapters of the theme Tapestry of the Past, you have seen examples of the art and architecture in India across several centuries. What do you think are the factors that enabled their creators to achieve such high levels of excellence? Discuss in groups and share in class.
Answer

Excellence on that scale was not individual genius; it was a whole system of human capital. This chapter’s section on India’s ancient skill heritage supplies five factors, and each of them maps onto something you have already met in this chapter.

FactorWhat the chapter saysWhere you have met the idea
Written technical standardsThe śhilpa śhāstras gave detailed design guidelines for sculptures, paintings, buildings, wooden items and jewellery; texts on sculpture prescribe exact postures, colours, measurements and proportions of figuresEducation — knowledge codified so it does not have to be rediscovered
Knowledge passed down and built onKnowledge was passed on from generation to generation, and also built on. Generations of families of sculptors worked on India’s temples over centuriesTraining and apprenticeship — human capital accumulating across lifetimes
Work treated as an offeringWork was a form of expressing one’s nature and striving for perfection, an offering to the deity or the receiver; it had to be created with devotionSocial and cultural influences — the same slot that kaizen occupies for Japan
Art and knowledge togetherCreating products involved a unique blend of kalā (art) and vidyā (knowledge)Neither a beautiful design that will not stand, nor a sound structure nobody wants to look at
Respect for tools and techniqueThe tools — a type of technology — were worshipped; the tradition continues as Viśhwakarmā pūjā or Āyudha pūjāTechnology as an enabler, page 176

The most striking piece of evidence is the one in the DON’T MISS OUT box: those sculptor families “used their skills without expecting to see the finished outcome” — a temple could take longer than a working life. They pursued excellence by practising regularly and learning new techniques, treating work as worship.

Why this matters for an economics chapter: it is the strongest possible demonstration that human capital is real capital. Those builders had almost no financial capital and very simple technology. What they had was accumulated skill, exact standards and a culture that refused shoddy work — and that alone produced the monuments you studied in Tapestry of the Past. Also add a factor of your own that the box implies: steady patronage by rulers and temples, which gave the craft families a market for centuries so the skill was worth passing on.
Was this helpful? Report an error