Q1.
Can you think of some technological advancements that have impacted the lives of people and communities around you? Talk to elders at home and in the neighbourhood about it.
Answer
How to get a real answer out of the elders. Do not ask “has technology changed life?” — everyone says yes. Ask about a specific task and a specific time:
- How did you send money to a relative in another town before?
- Where did you get water, and how long did it take?
- What did you cook on, and who collected the fuel?
- How did you find out that a job was available, or that a relative was ill?
- What did the family do when someone fell sick at night?
| Advancement | What changed for the community |
|---|---|
| Mobile phones and UPI | A migrant worker sends money home the same evening instead of travelling with cash; a vegetable vendor takes payment without change |
| LPG connections | Hours a day saved collecting firewood — mostly by women and girls — and much less smoke indoors |
| Electricity, and now solar panels and LED lights | Study hours after dark; refrigeration for a shop; a pump for irrigation |
| Tube wells, drip irrigation, tractors, threshers | More output per worker in farming — the chapter’s point that increased machine use in agriculture lowers dependence on labour |
| Advance weather alerts and GPS | Farmers plan operations; transporters find the shortest routes |
| Online learning and telemedicine (Fig. 7.22) | A course or a specialist opinion reaches a village that has neither a college nor a hospital |
| SWAYAM and the National Career Service | Free courses from Grade 9 onwards in robotics, aquaculture, textile printing; job listings from plumbing to accounting |
Sample answer: “My grandmother said the biggest change in her lifetime was not the phone but the bus route and the tar road. Before it, a sick person was carried on a cot to the main road. After it, the primary health centre became reachable in twenty minutes, girls began going to the high school in the next town, and vegetable growers could send produce to the market the same morning instead of selling it cheap in the village. One piece of infrastructure changed health, education and income together.”
Be fair to both sides. The same interviews usually turn up losses too — the village weaver who could not compete with mill cloth, the letter-writer whose work vanished, the tank that dried up when everyone drilled borewells. The chapter itself insists on this balance: technology is an enabler, but page 180 reminds us that production can degrade the very resources it uses. A good report records both.