How to build this answer. You are giving advice, so structure it as advice: name the landscape, say precisely what is threatening it, say what it does for the country (not just why it is beautiful), and then give recommendations a government could actually carry out. Choose a landscape you know something concrete about — a nearby river, forest, coast, hill range or wetland is better than a famous one you know only by name.
Sample answer:
Landscape chosen: the Western Ghats.
What it is and what it does. The Western Ghats are an old, forested range running down the western edge of peninsular India. They act as the water tower of the whole peninsula: the Godavari, the Krishna, the Kaveri and dozens of smaller rivers rise in them, and the reservoirs that supply Mumbai, Pune, Bengaluru and Chennai are filled by rain that these hills catch. They catch it because they stand across the path of the south-west monsoon winds, forcing the moist air to rise and drop its rain on their western slopes — which is also why the land east of them, in the rain shadow, is so much drier. They are, in addition, one of the richest storehouses of plants and animals in the country, with many species found nowhere else.
What threatens them. Forest cleared for plantations, quarrying and mining, hill roads and construction that loosen the slopes and cause landslides during heavy rain, and dams and diversions that change the rivers themselves.
My recommendations to the government. First, protect the remaining continuous forest as a connected belt rather than as scattered patches, so that animals can move between them. Second, regulate quarrying and hill-slope construction strictly, since a bare slope in monsoon country becomes a landslide. Third, involve the people who live in the Ghats, giving forest communities a legal share in protecting and earning from the forest, as the indigenous communities of the Amazon do. Fourth, monitor the forest cover by satellite each year and publish the figures, so that loss is caught early. Finally, treat the Ghats as water infrastructure in the budget, not as scenery: every rupee spent protecting the catchment is a rupee not spent on water scarcity in four state capitals.
Why it happens: the strongest argument to a government is rarely ‘this place is precious’. It is ‘this place is already doing an expensive job for free’. The Western Ghats supply water and hold soil in place; a reef breaks storm waves; a mangrove shields a coast; a forest stores carbon. Once the service is named, protection becomes the cheaper option instead of the generous one — and that is the case a geographer is best placed to make.
Tip: Other strong choices, each with a clear service you can argue for: the Sundarbans mangroves (storm protection and fish nurseries), the Himalayan glaciers (dry-season river flow), the Thar Desert (a fragile dryland ecosystem with its own unique life), the Gulf of Mannar coral reefs, or the Chilika and Loktak lakes.