NCERT Solutions Exploring Society: India and Beyond Chapter 9 –37Chapter opener — The Big Questions

Book page 36 Updated on2026-09-05

Q1.
How did a land of diverse geographies, languages and religions come together to challenge and finally end nearly two centuries of British rule?
Answer

It came together because colonial rule pressed on everyone in the same few ways, and because Indians slowly built the things a common struggle needs — shared grievances, shared organisations, shared symbols and shared methods. Diversity never disappeared; what changed was that local anger was converted into national action.

1. The grievances were common, even where the languages were not. Heavy land taxes produced famines and hit peasants and tribals from Punjab to Chota Nagpur. Cheap British manufactures ruined local industry. And the humiliation was identical everywhere: lower pay for Indians in the army, civil services and universities; juries with British majorities that were lenient towards Europeans; clubs, trains and city areas where Indians could not mix with Europeans; the Arms Act of 1878 that disarmed Indians but not the British; the Vernacular Press Act of the same year that censored Indian-language newspapers.

2. Organisations gave the anger an address. The Indian National Congress met for the first time in Bombay in 1885 with 72 delegates from diverse regions and religions, and after that it met every year in a different city. Regional bodies had failed; an all-India forum did not.

3. Newspapers carried one argument to many languages. Tilak’s Marathi Kesari, Bipin Chandra Pal’s and Aurobindo Ghose’s English Bande Mataram, the Bengali Yugantar, Naoroji’s Voice of India, Banerjee’s The Bengalee. A reader in Poona and a reader in Calcutta could be angry about the same thing on the same morning.

4. Symbols crossed language borders faster than arguments did. Bankim’s Bande Mataram, composed in 1875, became “a rallying cry and a mantra during the 1905 awakening”; Subramania Bharati translated it into Tamil; Lala Lajpat Rai named a Punjabi publication after it. Abanindranath Tagore painted ‘Bharat Mata’ in 1905. In Bengal in 1905 people tied rakhis on one another’s wrists to answer a partition meant to divide them.

5. The methods were ones anyone could join. You did not need English, a degree or a weapon to refuse foreign cloth, to spin khadi, to walk in a procession, to picket a liquor shop or to pick up a handful of salt. That is why the movement could include, in the words of a British report, “thousands of women, many being of good family and high educational attainments… actually from purdah”.

6. Shocks did the rest. The Partition of Bengal (1905), Jallianwala Bagh (1919), the all-British Simon Commission (1927), the lathi charge that killed Lala Lajpat Rai (1928), the executions of 1931 — each turned a regional protest into a national one.

Why it finally worked: By 1946 the British could no longer count on the two things an empire needs — obedience and armed force. Quit India showed that a hundred thousand people could be jailed and the country would still not be governable; the Royal Indian Air Force and Royal Indian Navy mutinies showed that even Indian servicemen could no longer be relied upon. Add Britain’s exhaustion after World War II and a worldwide wave of decolonisation, and staying became impossible.
The honest limit: The chapter itself says the movement “unified the subcontinent, but could not resolve the political Hindu-Muslim question”. Unity was real, and it was incomplete — and 1947 shows both.
Q2.
What were the main developments and who were some important figures in India’s struggle for freedom?
Answer

The struggle moves through five broad phases. The table follows the chapter’s own timeline (Fig. 2.2).

PhaseMain developmentsSome important figures
Crown rule and reform
1858–1900
British Crown takes direct control (1858); royal proclamation and ‘paramountcy’ over some 560 princely states; Arms Act and Vernacular Press Act (1878); reform movements; Kuka (Namdhari) movement crushed in 1872; Chapekar brothers (1897); Birsa Munda’s Ulgulaan (1899–1900); Indian National Congress founded (1885); Vande Mataram composed (1875)Queen Victoria; Raja Ram Mohan Roy; Swami Dayananda Saraswati; Vidyasagar; Syed Ahmed Khan; Jyotirao and Savitribai Phule; Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay; Swami Vivekananda; Baba Ram Singh; Birsa Munda; A.O. Hume; Dadabhai Naoroji; W.C. Bonnerjee
Swadeshi and the Nationalist turn
1905–1915
Partition of Bengal (1905); Swadeshi, boycott and National Education; Bande Mataram daily and the Bengal National College (1906); Congress adopts Swaraj at Calcutta (Dec 1906); All-India Muslim League founded at Dhaka (1906); Surat split (1907); Alipore Bomb Case and Tilak’s imprisonment (1908); partition annulled and capital shifted to Delhi (1911); bomb thrown at Viceroy Hardinge (1912); Ghadar Movement (1914–15); Bagha Jatin killed at Balasore (1915)Lord Curzon; Rabindranath Tagore; Surendranath Banerjee; Bipin Chandra Pal; Aurobindo Ghose; Bal Gangadhar Tilak; Lala Lajpat Rai (‘Lal–Bal–Pal’); Gokhale, Pherozeshah Mehta, Rashbehari Ghosh (Moderates); Khudiram Bose; Prafulla Chaki; Barindra Ghose; V.D. Savarkar; Rash Behari Bose; Kartar Singh Sarabha; Bagha Jatin; Abanindranath Tagore; Subramania Bharati
Gandhi and mass mobilisation
1915–1922
Gandhi returns from South Africa (1915); Lucknow session reunites the Congress and the Lucknow Pact with the League (1916); Home Rule Movement (1916); satyagrahas at Champaran, Ahmedabad, Kheda (1917–18); Rowlatt Act and Jallianwala Bagh (1919); Khilafat Movement (1919–22); Non-Cooperation Movement (1920–22), withdrawn after Chauri ChauraM.K. Gandhi; Annie Besant; Gopal Krishna Gokhale; Muhammad Ali Jinnah; Vallabhbhai Patel; Muhammad Ali and Shaukat Ali; Maulana Abul Kalam Azad; Brigadier-General Dyer and O’Dwyer (on the other side); Motilal Nehru; Jawaharlal Nehru; Chittaranjan Das; Subhas Chandra Bose; Udham Singh
Purna Swaraj and civil disobedience
1925–1935
Kakori train robbery (1925); Simon Commission boycotted and Lala Lajpat Rai dies (1927–28); Motilal Nehru Report asks for dominion status (1928); Bardoli movement (1928); Purna Swaraj at Lahore (Dec 1929); Salt March and Civil Disobedience (1930); Qissa Khwani Bazaar massacre (1930); executions of Bhagat Singh, Rajguru and Sukhdev, and the Gandhi–Irwin Pact (1931); Round Table Conference and the Poona Pact; movement withdrawn (1934); Government of India Act (1935)Ram Prasad Bismil; Ashfaqulla Khan; Chandrashekhar Azad; Bhagat Singh; Sukhdev Thapar; Shivaram Rajguru; Suniti Chowdhury; Shanti Ghosh; Bina Das; Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel; Sarojini Naidu; Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan; Chandra Singh Garhwali; Viceroy Irwin; B.R. Ambedkar; Muhammad Iqbal
War, Quit India and freedom
1939–1947
India taken into World War II without consultation; Lahore Resolution (1940); Bose escapes India (1941); Cripps Mission rejected and Quit India launched (1942); Bengal famine and the reorganised INA and Azad Hind government (1943); INA defeated in the north-east (1944); INA trials, RIAF and RIN mutinies, Cabinet Mission and Direct Action Day (1946); Interim Government; Independence and Partition (1947); integration of the princely statesWinston Churchill; Stafford Cripps; C. Rajagopalachari; Aruna Asaf Ali; Kanaklata Barua; Ram Manohar Lohia; Jayaprakash Narayan; Viceroy Linlithgow; Subhas Chandra Bose; Muhammad Ali Jinnah; Mountbatten; Cyril Radcliffe; Jawaharlal Nehru; Sardar Patel
Remember what the chapter says first: the ICHR’s Dictionary of Martyrs lists some 14,000 names. “Freedom fighters not mentioned here are no less important than the few who illustrate our story.”
Q3.
What issues did the leading freedom fighters agree or disagree upon?
Answer

They agreed on the end and disagreed on almost everything else about how to reach it. What united them: that foreign rule was unjust, that Indians were being economically drained and personally humiliated, and that Indians must have a real say in governing themselves. Beyond that, the disagreements were serious, public, and often between friends.

The issueOne sideThe other sideWhat happened
How much freedom to ask forModerates — autonomy inside the British Empire, won by gradual reform (Naoroji, Gokhale, Pherozeshah Mehta, Surendranath Banerjee)Nationalists — nothing less than independence (Tilak, Lala Lajpat Rai, Aurobindo Ghose)‘Swaraj’ was adopted in 1906 without being defined. When Moderates tried to step back from it, the Congress split at Surat in 1907
Peaceful pressure or armed actionPetitions, then mass non-violent action — boycott, satyagraha, khadi, the Salt MarchRevolutionaries — that “the use of force was a legitimate means”, because non-violence was too slow and put too little pressure (HRA, HSRA, Anushilan Samiti, Abhinav Bharat, Ghadar)Both streams grew side by side. Bhagat Singh’s execution in 1931 was mourned across the whole spectrum — Bose called his spirit “unconquerable”
Whether to call off a movement over violenceGandhi — Chauri Chaura (Feb 1922) was ‘inhuman conduct’, so Non-Cooperation must stop at onceMotilal Nehru, Jawaharlal Nehru, C.R. Das and Subhas Chandra Bose disapproved of the withdrawalMotilal Nehru and C.R. Das formed the Swaraj Party to try a different strategy; it was short-lived after Das’s death in 1925
Mixing religion with the national movementGandhi backed the Khilafat cause as a chance to unite Hindus and Muslims against British ruleSome Congressmen said Turkey’s Caliph was no concern of India’s; Syed Ahmad Khan had objected to tying Indian Muslims’ loyalty to a faraway religious power; Jinnah left the Congress in 1920 warning against mixing religion with the freedom movementThe alliance did increase Muslim participation — but historians also note that it “reinforced the sense of separateness”, and riots followed
Separate electoratesThe Congress accepted separate electorates for Muslims in the Lucknow Pact (1916); Ambedkar wanted them for the Depressed Classes so that they would have a real political voiceGandhi feared separate electorates for the Depressed Classes would permanently divide Hindu society, and went on a ‘fast unto death’The Poona Pact: no separate electorates, but an increased number of reserved seats in the legislatures
Seeking foreign help in wartimeSubhas Chandra Bose — freedom would come only through armed struggle, so approach Britain’s enemies (Germany, then Japan)Many admired his courage; others criticised his alliance with Nazi Germany and JapanThe INA was militarily defeated in 1944, but the INA trials of 1946 shook British authority more than the campaign had
One nation or twoNearly all Congress leaders, including Maulana Azad and Abdul Ghaffar Khan, opposed the Two-Nation ideaIqbal proposed a separate Muslim territory in 1930; Jinnah endorsed Pakistan; the Hindu Mahasabha under Savarkar also saw Hindus and Muslims as two distinct nations, though without explicitly asking for partitionPartition in 1947 — which, the chapter notes, “was widely opposed even by the Indian National Congress. There was no national consensus”
Why the disagreements matter: They are not a weakness in the story — they are the story. A movement that could hold a Moderate lawyer, a Marathi newspaper editor, a Bengali bomb-maker, a Pathan pacifist and a Gujarati spinning khadi inside one struggle was strong precisely because it was argued over. The one disagreement it could not settle was the last one, and that is where the tragedy of 1947 begins.
Was this helpful? Report an error