NCERT Solutions Exploring Society: India and Beyond Chapter 5 End-of-chapter exercise — Questions, activities and projects

Book page 84 Updated on2026-09-05

Q1.
Discuss what could be the meaning of the quotation at the start of the chapter.
Answer

The quotation, by Sri Aurobindo, is on page 75:

“In India at a very early time the spiritual and cultural unity was made complete and became the very stuff of the life of all this great surge of humanity between the Himalayas and the two seas.”

Take it apart phrase by phrase.

PhraseWhat it meansWhat in the chapter supports it
“at a very early time”Not recently — thousands of years agoThe Ṛig Veda; the Mahābhārata, written from a few centuries BCE onward
“spiritual and cultural unity”Not one government, but shared ideas, texts, beliefs and ways of livingThe Mahābhārata knows regions from Gandhāra to Kerala; a Tamil poem and a Sanskrit purāṇa define the same country
“was made complete”It was not partial or patchy; it reached across the whole landFig. 5.4 — the Mahābhārata's regions “cover the entire geography of the Subcontinent”
“the very stuff of the life”It was not decoration; it was what everyday life was made ofThe names survive in living use today — Bharat, Bharatam, and ‘India, that is Bharat’ in the Constitution
“between the Himalayas and the two seas”A geographical definition of India: the mountain wall in the north, the Arabian Sea and the Bay of Bengal on either sideExactly the Viṣhṇu Purāṇa's definition (page 80) and exactly what Fig. 5.2 shows

Putting it together in one sentence: Sri Aurobindo is saying that long before India was one country, it was already one culture — and that this shared culture stretched right across the land bounded by the Himalayas and the two seas.

How to run the discussion in class: split the quotation into the five phrases above and give one to each group. Each group must find one piece of evidence from this chapter for its phrase and read it out. You will find that the whole chapter — the Ṛig Veda's rivers, the Mahābhārata's regions, the Viṣhṇu Purāṇa's verse, the Tamil poem, and the Constitution's first line — is really an argument for this one sentence.
One point worth debating honestly: ‘unity’ does not mean ‘sameness’. This land has always held many languages, foods, dresses, gods and customs — Fig. 5.4 alone names 38 different regions. Sri Aurobindo's claim is that underneath that variety runs something shared. A good discussion should ask what that shared thing is, and where you can still see it today.
Q2.
True or false? (i) The Ṛig Veda describes the entire geography of India. (ii) The Viṣhṇu Purāṇa describes the entire Subcontinent. (iii) In Aśhoka's time, ‘Jambudvīpa’ included what is today India, parts of Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan. (iv) The Mahābhārata lists many regions, including Kashmir, Kutch, and Kerala. (v) The term ‘Hindustān’ first appeared in a Greek inscription more than 2,000 years ago. (vi) In ancient Persian, the word ‘Hindu’ refers to the Hindu religion. (vii) ‘Bhārata’ is a name given to India by foreign travellers.
Answer

Three are true and four are false. The reason matters more than the answer, so each one is corrected below.

#StatementAnswerWhy — and the correction
(i)The Ṛig Veda describes the entire geography of India.FALSEThe Ṛig Veda names only the north-west region — ‘Sapta Sindhava’, the land of the seven rivers (page 77). The whole Subcontinent is first named in the Mahābhārata.
(ii)The Viṣhṇu Purāṇa describes the entire Subcontinent.TRUE“The country that lies north of the ocean and south of the snowy mountains is called Bhārata” (page 80) — that description covers the whole Subcontinent.
(iii)In Aśhoka's time, ‘Jambudvīpa’ included what is today India, parts of Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan.TRUEWord for word what page 79 says about Aśhoka's inscription, dated to about 250 BCE.
(iv)The Mahābhārata lists many regions, including Kashmir, Kutch, and Kerala.TRUEPage 78 lists Kāshmīra (more or less today's Kashmir), Kaccha (today's Kutch) and Kerala (more or less today's Kerala), along with Kurukṣhetra, Vanga and Prāgjyotiṣha.
(v)The term ‘Hindustān’ first appeared in a Greek inscription more than 2,000 years ago.FALSETwo mistakes in one line. It was a Persian inscription, not Greek, and it was about 1,800 years ago, not more than 2,000 (page 83).
(vi)In ancient Persian, the word ‘Hindu’ refers to the Hindu religion.FALSEThe book is explicit: in ancient Persian ‘Hindu’ is a purely geographical term; it does not refer to the Hindu religion (page 81). It simply meant ‘of the Sindhu region’.
(vii)‘Bhārata’ is a name given to India by foreign travellers.FALSEThe exact opposite. ‘Bhārata’ is a name Indians gave themselves — from ‘Bharata’ in the Ṛig Veda, through ‘Bhāratavarṣha’ in the Mahābhārata, to ‘Bhārata’ in the Viṣhṇu Purāṇa. The names foreigners gave were built from Sindhu.
Score: TRUE → (ii), (iii), (iv)  •  FALSE → (i), (v), (vi), (vii)
Tip: four of the seven statements test the same single idea — who gave which name. Keep two lists in your head: Indian names = Sapta Sindhava, Bhāratavarṣha, Jambudvīpa, Bhārata; foreign names = Hindu, Indoi, India, Yindu, Hindustān. Almost every trick question in this chapter is a name moved from one list to the other.
Q3.
If you were born some 2,000 years ago and had the chance to name our country, what name or names might you have chosen, and why? Use your imagination!
Answer

This one is meant to be your own, so no answer is ‘the’ answer. But an imaginative answer still has to work like a real ancient name — and the chapter shows you exactly how real ancient names were made.

Step 1 — pick your rule. Every name in this chapter follows one of four rules:

RuleExample from the chapterA name you could invent
Name it after a riverSapta Sindhava, and every foreign name from SindhuGangāvarṣha — ‘the country of the Ganga’, the river most people actually lived beside
Name it after the people who live thereBhāratavarṣha — ‘the country of the Bharatas’Bahubhāṣhīvarṣha — ‘the country of many languages’
Name it after a plant or animalJambudvīpa — the jamun treeMayūradvīpa — ‘the land of the peacock’, or Vaṭadvīpa, ‘the land of the banyan’
Name it after its boundariesThe Viṣhṇu Purāṇa's verse; the Tamil poem's “Kumari to the great mountain”Himasāgara — ‘snow-and-sea land’, the mountains in the north and the sea all around

Step 2 — give a reason. The marks in this question are in the why, not the name. A reason is good if it names something that is (a) true of the whole land, not just your corner of it, and (b) likely to still be true in a thousand years.

Sample answer: “If I had lived 2,000 years ago I would have called this land Himasāgara — ‘the land between the snow and the sea’. I would choose it because it is the one thing every part of the country shares: whichever direction you walk, you end at either the snowy mountains or the sea. It also does not belong to any one king, tribe or language, so people in Gandhāra and people in Kerala could both use it. My second choice would be Nadīvarṣha, ‘the land of rivers’, because the Indus, Ganga, Brahmaputra, Narmada, Godavari, Krishna and Kaveri all begin and end inside it — and rivers are what people build their lives around.”
Why this is a serious question and not just a game: naming is an act of definition. Choose a river and you make the country about water; choose a people and you make it about them; choose the boundaries and you make it about the land itself. Ancient Indians tried all three — and the one that survived, Bhārata, was the one that could belong to everybody.
Q4.
Why did people travel to India from various parts of the world in ancient times? What could be their motivations in undertaking such long journeys? (Hint: There could be at least four or five motivations)
Answer

The hint asks for four or five. Here are six, each with evidence — the first three come straight out of this chapter.

MotivationWho came, and whyEvidence
1. Conquest and powerRulers wanted land, tribute and control of rich river valleysIn the 6th century BCE a Persian emperor launched a military campaign and gained control of the Indus region (page 81). Later invaders used the name Hindustān for the whole Subcontinent (page 83)
2. Religion and pilgrimageIndia was the land of the Buddha, and pilgrims came to see the places where he had lived and taughtXuanzang travelled from China in the 7th century CE, visited many parts of India and stayed 17 years (page 83)
3. Learning and booksScholars came to study with Indian teachers and to collect texts to carry homeXuanzang met scholars, collected Buddhist texts and, back in China, translated the manuscripts from Sanskrit into Chinese. “Several other Chinese scholars visited India over the centuries” (page 83)
4. Trade and wealthIndia's spices, cotton textiles, gems, ivory and steel were wanted everywhere; traders came by land through the north-western passes and by sea to the western and eastern coastsThe land itself — the two seas and the great rivers on Fig. 5.2 — is what made those routes possible. This is why the Persians and the Greeks knew of India at all, and why they needed a name for it
5. Diplomacy and serviceKings sent ambassadors to Indian courts, and some foreigners stayed on as officials, soldiers or physiciansForeign accounts — travelogues and chronicles — are one of the kinds of sources listed in the previous chapter of this book
6. CuriositySome simply wanted to see a land they had heard extraordinary things about, and to write about itThe Chinese called India Tianzhu, a word that could be read as ‘heavenly master’ — “this reflects the respect the ancient Chinese had for India as the land of the Buddha” (page 83)

Remember how hard these journeys were. There were no engines. A traveller from China had to cross deserts and the mountain passes of the north-west, or sail for months with the monsoon winds. Xuanzang's round trip took 17 years. Nobody undertakes that for a small reason — which is itself the best evidence of how strongly these six motives pulled.

Why this question sits at the end of this particular chapter: every one of these travellers left India a name. The Persian soldier left ‘Hind’; the Greek geographer left ‘Indoi’; the Chinese pilgrim left ‘Yindu’ and ‘Tianzhu’; the later invader left ‘Hindustān’. The names on page 83 are, quite literally, a list of the reasons people came.
Project idea: make a class wall-map. Mark Iran, Greece and China on one side and India on the other, draw the routes, and write on each arrow the traveller's reason and the name they left behind. You will end up with the chapter's table of names — drawn as a map of journeys.
Was this helpful? Report an error