False.
He looked back “to reassure himself that there was still daylight outside” — that is, to comfort himself in the pitch darkness, not to watch for a train.
Book page 149 to 151 Updated on2026-09-05
False.
He looked back “to reassure himself that there was still daylight outside” — that is, to comfort himself in the pitch darkness, not to watch for a train.
A. there was nothing to see in the tunnel
The extract says it in so many words: “Suraj didn't stop, because there was nothing to do in the tunnel and nothing to see.”
It means that for the several hours between two trains, no engine, no smoke and no human noise fill the cutting — so the jungle takes it back. The bats, lizards, birds and even the leopard move through the tunnel and along the tracks as if the railway were not there.
Curiosity — an adventurous, questioning nature that has to find things out first-hand.
He does not walk through the tunnel for any gain. There is nothing to see and nothing to do, yet “he had simply wanted to walk through, so that he would know what the inside of a tunnel was really like”. Knowing about it was not enough; he wanted to know it by experience.
His concern was for the leopard's life. The night mail was ten minutes away, and if the animal was still inside the tunnel when the engine charged through, “it will be run over and killed”.
He puts it as a matter of personal responsibility: “I can't let that happen.”
… the leopard knew him well — they had seen each other many times, and although it preys on goats and stray dogs, it had never shown any interest in harming human beings.
His words are: “Not this leopard. It knows me well. We have seen each other many times. It has a weakness for goats and stray dogs, but it will not harm us.”
The true sentences are B, C and D.
| Statement | True / False | Evidence in the extract |
|---|---|---|
| A. Suraj wants to see the leopards in the jungle. | False | Nothing in the extract says this. His question is about danger, not about sight-seeing. |
| B. Suraj is concerned about Sunder Singh's safety. | True | “But won't it attack us if we try to drive it out?” asked Suraj, beginning to share the watchman's concern. |
| C. The leopard in the tunnel attacks goats and stray dogs. | True | “It has a weakness for goats and stray dogs.” |
| D. Sunder Singh wants to protect Suraj. | True | “I'll take my axe with me. You stay here, Suraj.” |
| E. Sunder Singh knows all about the animals in the jungle. | False | Too sweeping. The extract shows only that he knows this one leopard well. |
B. cautious
He has just said twice that the leopard will not harm them — so he is not afraid (D). But he adds “Even so, I'll take my axe with me”. Those two words are the key: he is taking a sensible precaution against the small chance that he is wrong.
He is making a joke, but the joke carries real feeling. He means that the tunnel is his in every way that matters, and that the Government merely borrows it to run trains through.
His reason is: “It is truly my tunnel, since no one else will have anything to do with it.” Nobody else wants this lonely posting, nobody else inspects the tunnel twice a day, nobody else keeps it clear of obstacles or waves the flag and the lamp. The care is entirely his, so the ownership feels like his too.
The example: “Nothing happens to me out here. But last month, when I went into town, I was almost run over by a bus.” In years of living beside a jungle full of leopards he has not been hurt once; one visit to town nearly killed him.
What it tells us about him:
He no longer lives beside the jungle; he lives inside it, on its own terms. The story shows this again and again:
On the surface they have nothing in common: one is an ageing watchman living alone in a forest cutting, the other a schoolboy from a town whose father runs a business. What draws them together is:
Because that is exactly what he looks like from a speeding night train. The story's last sentence says he “would always remain a firefly for those travelling thousands as he lit up the darkness for steam engines and leopards”.
The comparison works on three levels:
Yes, clearly. Everything he does in the story is done for the sake of experience rather than for any reward: