NCERT Solutions Exploring Society: India and Beyond Chapter 10 The questions India had to answer before independence — In-text Questions

Book page 213 Updated on2026-09-05

Q1.
What type of government should we have?
Answer

India chose a democratic republic with a parliamentary form of government.

  • Democratic — the people enjoy equal political rights, elect their rulers and hold them accountable, and the government is run according to some basic rules.
  • Republic — the head of the state is an elected person, not a hereditary king.
  • Parliamentary — the executive, headed by the prime minister, is drawn from and answerable to the legislature.
  • Three organs with separated powers — legislature, executive and judiciary, with checks and balances between them.
  • Three tiers — central, state and local (Panchayati Raj), each with its own functions and responsibilities.
Why this choice: India had just ended rule by a power it had not elected. A hereditary or unaccountable government would have repeated the very thing the freedom struggle had fought. A republic in which the highest office is filled by election was the natural opposite of colonial rule.
Q2.
What rules and principles should guide us?
Answer

The principles chosen were the ones the freedom movement had lived by and the ones India's own heritage had long held. The chapter lists them as equality of all, justice for all, freedom, fraternity and the preservation of India's cultural heritage.

They were then written into the Constitution in three layers:

LayerWhat it doesExample
The PreambleStates the guiding values in a single paragraphJustice, Liberty, Equality, Fraternity
Fundamental RightsTurns values into promises that can be claimed in courtArticle 14, equality before law
Directive PrinciplesTurns values into goals the government should work towardsArticle 47, nutrition, standard of living and public health

Some principles came from India's own culture — acceptance that people may hold different points of view, Nature as sacred, the pursuit of learning, respect for women, vasudhaiva kutumbakam and sarve bhavantu sukhinah. The old emphasis on the duties of people in governance reappears as the Fundamental Duties.

Q3.
Who should have the right to vote?
Answer

Every adult citizen — this is called universal adult franchise.

The chapter records that one of the ‘how’ questions the framers had to answer was: “How do we make sure that every adult citizen has a right to vote?” Their answer was that the electoral system “has been laid down to ensure that every eligible citizen of the country is enabled to vote”.

That means the vote does not depend on:

  • caste, religion, community or gender;
  • how much property or wealth a person owns;
  • whether a person can read and write;
  • where in India the person lives.
Why it matters: in several older democracies the vote was given first to landowners, then to educated men, and only much later to women. India gave it to every adult from the very first election. If all citizens are equal before the law, it would make no sense to weigh their votes differently.
Q4.
How should we decide on disputes?
Answer

Through an independent judiciary, using the Constitution and the law as the standard — not by force and not by the government's own preference.

A dispute arises (between citizens, or between a citizen and the State)
→ it goes to a court
→ the judge decides whether a law has been broken and what punishment is necessary
→ if the dispute is about a law itself, the judiciary checks whether that law is in accordance with the Constitution
→ the highest court in the country is the Supreme Court, which protects the Constitution

Two features make this work. First, the judiciary is one of the three separate organs of government, so it can rule against the executive or the legislature. Second, the idea of an independent judiciary was one of the things the framers took from the American Constitution.

Check it yourself: the flag case of 2004 is a real example — a citizen who believed a rule was wrong took the government to court, and the Supreme Court agreed with him. That is a dispute decided by law rather than by power.
Was this helpful? Report an error