Because having the machinery is not the same as the machinery working perfectly everywhere, every day, for 1.4 billion people. The chapter sets the problem up honestly: the Constitution, “thousands of laws, many layers of elected representatives, a vast bureaucracy, and a judiciary… all of which help us greatly in our daily lives” — and yet “we still encounter many issues that need to be addressed — people in difficult socio-economic conditions, lack of access to good education and healthcare, infrastructure that is of poor quality, inadequate access to government schemes, and so on.”
Reasons that follow from what the chapter itself says.
- The scale is enormous. India has “over 1.4 billion people, thousands of towns and villages, and many languages and cultures”. A scheme that works in one district can fail in the next, simply because it depends on the particular people running it there.
- Power tempts. Page 150 states the reason such power must be limited: “elected members and government officers might use their power unchecked, which would threaten citizens’ rights.” Wherever an official can decide who gets a licence, a house or a place in a scheme, some will misuse that decision unless they are watched.
- Distance hides things. A decision taken far from the people it affects is harder to question. That is exactly the argument the chapter makes for decentralisation on page 163: “When leaders are closer to the people, it is easier to question them, ask for answers, and make sure they do their job.”
- Information gaps. If you do not know how much money was sanctioned for your road, you cannot tell whether it was spent on your road. That is why the chapter’s answer to corruption is the RTI Act — “the information brings transparency and accountability.”
What the system does about it. The chapter does not leave the problem hanging; it lists the machinery built for exactly this — grievance redressal offices in departments, vigilance commissions “to investigate matters of corruption”, the Public Grievances Portal with a fixed time limit for a reply, the RTI Act, an independent judiciary, a free media, and civil society organisations.