NCERT Solutions Exploring Society: India and Beyond Chapter 9 Role play — LET'S EXPLORE

Book page 206 Updated on2026-09-05

Q1.
Enact democracy
Answer

Scene to enact: the class must decide how to spend ₹2,000 given for the annual day.

Roles — 5 voters per group, 3 candidates, 1 Election Officer, 1 Speaker, 3 ‘ministers', 1 judge.

  1. The Election Officer announces the poll and the rules.
  2. Each candidate speaks for one minute: ‘If elected, I will spend it on …'
  3. Every student votes once, secretly, on a slip.
  4. Slips are counted in the open. The winners form the ‘council of ministers' and the class becomes the ‘legislature'.
  5. The proposal is debated, amended and put to a vote. The majority decides.
  6. Someone objects that the rule was broken; the judge hears both sides and rules — even against the ministers.

The line that ends the scene: ‘We disagreed, we voted, and we accepted the result — and even the winners had to follow the rules.'

What the audience must notice: discussion before decision, a secret and equal vote, a losing side that is not punished, and a judge who is not on anyone's team.
Q2.
Enact monarchy
Answer

Scene to enact: the same ₹2,000 — but now the class is a kingdom.

Roles — a raja or rani, a council of ministers, a learned advisor, and subjects.

  1. The crown passes to the ruler because of birth: ‘My mother ruled before me.'
  2. Subjects petition the ruler; they may request, not vote.
  3. The ministers advise; the advisor reminds the ruler of rājadharma — that the welfare of the people is the highest priority and that authority is temporary and bound by dharma.
  4. The ruler decides. Play it twice: once as a ruler who listens (like Chandrāpīḍa going to the cobbler) and once as an absolute monarch who refuses to hear anyone.

The line that ends the scene: ‘The decision was fair today — but only because the ruler chose to be fair.'

Why play it twice: it shows the real difference. In a monarchy a good outcome depends on the ruler's character; in a democracy it depends on a process the people control.
Q3.
Enact dictatorship
Answer

Scene to enact: the same ₹2,000, decided by one leader and two aides.

Roles — a leader, two aides, and the rest of the class as citizens. Keep the tone thoughtful, not comic; the point is to feel the absence of choice, not to mock anyone.

  1. The leader announces the decision without consulting anyone: ‘The money will be spent on X. The matter is closed.'
  2. A citizen raises a hand to object; the aide says objections are not allowed.
  3. Rules appear that have nothing to do with the money — everyone must sit in the same posture, no one may whisper.
  4. A citizen is asked to report who whispered.
  5. Someone asks when the next choice will be made. There is no answer.

The line that ends the scene: ‘Nothing was voted on, nothing could be appealed, and no one knew when it would change.'

Tip: do not name any real living leader or country in the role play. The purpose is to understand the system — one person or a small group with power that no constitution or law limits.
Q4.
What do you find to be the most suitable form of government?
Answer

After the three scenes, most classes will choose democracy — and the reasons will come from what they just felt, which is the whole purpose of the activity.

In the role playDemocracyMonarchyDictatorship
Who decidedThe majority, after debateThe ruler, after adviceOne person, alone
Could you disagree safely?YesYou could requestNo
Could a wrong decision be changed?Yes — at the next voteOnly if the ruler agreedNo
How did the losing side feel?Disappointed, but heardDependentSilenced
Sample answer: ‘Our class found democracy the most suitable form. It was slower than the other two — the debate took twice as long as the dictator's announcement — but it was the only one where a person who lost the vote was still treated as an equal, and the only one where a mistake could be corrected without asking permission from the person who made it. We also noticed that the good monarch and the bad monarch used exactly the same powers, which is what convinced us that a fair result should not depend on one person's character.'
Be fair while you argue: the chapter does not claim democracy is flawless. It says most countries consider it better, and then immediately lists democracy's own hurdles. A good answer says why you prefer it and what it demands from citizens.
Was this helpful? Report an error