Yes — zero. There is no symbol for it, and there is no way to build it, because a numeral here is a collection of symbols and zero would have to be an empty collection, which cannot be seen on the page.
Every counting number 1, 2, 3, … can be written, and here is the argument:
Take any number N.
Pick the largest landmark 5k with 5k ≤ N. Draw that symbol and subtract.
The leftover is smaller than before, so the process must stop.
When it stops, nothing is left over — every part has been drawn.
Provided you never use a symbol five or more times, that numeral is also the only one for N.
Why it happens: notice that the same objection applies to the Egyptian and Roman systems — none of them can write zero either, and none of them needed to, because they only ever recorded quantities that were actually there. Zero becomes indispensable only in a place value system, where an empty position must be shown so that 305 is not read as 35. That is why the invention of 0 belongs to the last stage of the story, not the first.
Did you know? Negative numbers and fractions cannot be written in this system either. Brahmagupta’s work of 628 CE, which gave 0 and the negative numbers the full status of numbers, is what opened all of that up.