NCERT Solutions Exploring Society: India and Beyond Chapter 15 From Walls to Paper — LET’S EXPLORE

Book page 228 Updated on2026-09-05

Q1.
Observe all the miniature paintings featured here. What are the similarities and differences you notice? What are the features that have changed, and which have been retained?
Answer

The five paintings to compare are the Rajput Bhāgavata Purāṇa folio (Fig. 8.15, 1520), Jahangir’s darbar from the Jahangir-nama (Fig. 8.16), the Razmnama wrestling folio (Fig. 8.17, 1598), the Bikaner Holi painting (Fig. 8.18, mid-17th century) and the Rāmāyaṇa scene (Fig. 8.19).

What all five share

  • Small scale, dense detail. Every one is a page-sized painting meant to be held and looked at closely, not hung on a wall — the shift the chapter describes, “from walls to paper”, after paper reached India in the 10th or 11th century.
  • Bright opaque mineral colour laid flat, with fine outlines and gold. Nothing is sketchy; every figure is finished.
  • Storytelling. Each is a moment from a narrative, and the moment chosen is the one that explains the whole episode.
  • Ruled borders framing the picture, and figures shown mostly in profile or three-quarter view with patterned textiles carefully picked out.

Where they differ

FeatureRajput works (8.15, 8.18, 8.19)Mughal works (8.16, 8.17)
SubjectKṛiṣhṇa defeating the whirlwind Tṛiṇāvarta; women playing Holi; Rāma and Lakṣhmaṇa searching for Sītā — devotional and epicThe emperor in darbar, and a wrestling match — court, event and person
ColourHot flat fields — a solid red pavilion in 8.15, a yellow text band and blue sky in 8.19Softer, more graded tones; modelled green hills, dark rounded trees, a crowd of muted robes
SpaceNo depth: hills, trees and figures are stacked in bands across the surfaceReceding ground; figures get smaller further back; architecture is drawn at an angle
FacesType faces — large eyes, one ideal profile repeatedIndividual likenesses; in 8.16 dozens of courtiers with different features, beards and turbans
TextDevanagari written into the picture — along the bottom edge of 8.15 and in the yellow band above 8.19Text kept out of the picture; the painting itself carries the account

Retained — the epic and Purāṇic themes; flat jewel colour and firm outline in the Rajput stream; profile faces and patterned cloth; the decorated border; the habit of packing a whole story into one page.

Changed — naturalism and portrait likeness enter; landscape gains depth and real trees, animals, gardens and hunting scenes; palettes become subtler; subjects become secular. And the change goes both ways: Fig. 8.17 is a Hindu epic painted in the Mughal manner for a Persian translation, while Fig. 8.18 is a Rajput Holi set on a garden terrace with Mughal-influenced softness — painted at Bikaner, the very city to which, the chapter says, Mughal court painters migrated.

Why the exchange happened: the chapter gives the mechanism rather than leaving it as a mystery — “based on the patrons’ taste and demand”. Painters moved to where the work was, and painted what the patron wanted. In Akbar’s atelier the work was even split up — one artist drew the lines, another filled the colours, a third finished — so styles mixed inside a single sheet of paper.
Was this helpful? Report an error