NCERT Solutions Exploring Society: India and Beyond Chapter 4 Enter the British — In-text Questions
Book page 91 Updated on2026-09-05
Q1.
Britain dominated the Indian subcontinent for nearly two centuries. How did this happen?
Answer
Not by an invasion. The chapter’s answer is that the British takeover was gradual, calculated, and often disguised as commercial enterprise rather than military invasion — which is exactly why it worked. Follow the steps.
How a trading company became an imperial power — the sequence described on pages 92–94.
A charter with teeth. Queen Elizabeth I granted the English East India Company a royal charter with special powers — including the right to raise a private army. A trading company was armed from the start.
The pretence of being mere traders. That is how it got footholds along the coast in the 17th century with minimal resistance — Surat, Madras, Bombay and Calcutta among the first. Local rulers did not object, because welcoming foreign trade was a longstanding Indian practice.
Selling military help. Company agents cultivated political relationships and offered military support to one ruler against his rival, inserting themselves into Indian conflicts and emerging “as power brokers rather than foreign invaders”.
Divide and rule. They played on rivalries between regional rulers and on succession disputes within ruling houses, and they identified and often encouraged tensions between religious communities.
Plassey (1757). Clive found the disgruntled men in Siraj-ud-daulah’s court and promised Mir Jafar, the Nawab’s own military commander, the throne in exchange for betrayal. Mir Jafar’s troops — the bulk of the Nawab’s army — simply stood aside. The British won despite their smaller numbers.
Revenue, then annexation. A few years after Plassey the Company secured the right to collect revenue in Bengal, Bihar and Odisha — some of India’s richest regions. In the 19th century came the Doctrine of Lapse, annexing any princely state whose ruler died without a natural male heir, and the subsidiary alliance, under which a ruler kept his throne but paid for British troops and could deal with foreign powers only through the British.
Why an ‘empire on the cheap’ was so hard to break: the subsidiary alliance let the British control vast territories without paying the administrative costs of direct rule — the Indian ruler paid those. And once a state was inside the system, leaving was virtually impossible, because any attempt to break free met overwhelming British military response. The genius of the method, and its cruelty, is in one sentence of the chapter: the system “effectively transferred real power to the British while burdening Indian rulers with the costs of their own subjugation”.