NCERT Solutions Exploring Society: India and Beyond Chapter 6 The Lives of the Ancients — LET'S EXPLORE

Book page 102 Updated on2026-09-05

Q1.
Complete the story found on the Lothal pot. How was such a story remembered for more than 4,000 years, in your opinion?
Answer

The story is the thirsty crow — and the painting on the Lothal pot (Fig. 6.15-6) shows the exact moment the crow works it out. Completed, it runs:

A crow is dying of thirst on a hot day.
It finds a pot with a little water at the very bottom — too low for its beak to reach.
It cannot tip the pot over, and it cannot break it.
Then it has an idea: it picks up pebbles one by one and drops them in.
The water rises with every pebble … until it reaches the top.
The crow drinks, and flies away.
Moral: where strength fails, thinking succeeds.

Why the pot is such remarkable evidence. The Harappan artist did not draw a crow sitting on a pot — that would only be a picture. The design shows the tall narrow pot with the water low inside it and the bird beside it, which means the painter expected you to already know the rest. A picture that assumes the story is proof that the story was already famous.

How was it remembered for more than 4,000 years? Not by writing — the Harappan script cannot be read, and this story was never written down until much later. It survived because of oral tradition, and the chapter's list of the characteristics of a civilisation names oral traditions as one of the ways cultural ideas are expressed. Four reasons it lasted:

  • It is short and has a clear picture at its centre — a bird, a pot, pebbles, rising water. Easy to remember, easy to retell.
  • It is told to children, and children grow up and tell it to their children. That is the strongest chain in the world; it never breaks as long as families continue.
  • The moral is universally useful — patience and cleverness beat force. Every generation finds it true.
  • It needs no props. Any grandmother anywhere can tell it. Unlike a building, a story costs nothing to carry.
Did you know? The same story later appears in Aesop's fables in Greece and in Indian story-collections, and it is still printed in Class 1 and 2 readers. When you tell it to a younger cousin, you are one link in a chain more than four thousand links long, that starts at a potter's wheel in Lothal.
Why this single pot is important to historians: it is one of the very few places where we can see a Harappan idea rather than a Harappan object. Bricks tell us how they built; the crow pot tells us what they found worth teaching their children.
Q2.
Consider the ‘Dancing Girl’ figurine. What do you make of the attitude the figurine expresses? Observe her bangles covering an entire arm, a practice still visible in parts of Gujarat and Rajasthan. Where else in this chapter can you spot bangles worn in this manner. What conclusion should we draw from this?
Answer

The attitude. The ‘Dancing Girl’ (Fig. 6.15-4) is a bronze figurine from Mohenjo-daro, only 10.8 cm high — smaller than your hand. Look at how she stands:

  • One hand on the hip, elbow out; the head tilted back and slightly to one side; one leg bent and relaxed, the weight on the other.
  • She wears no rich clothing — her ornaments are her dress: a necklace and the bangles.

The pose reads as confident, relaxed, self-assured, even a little playful — a person entirely at ease, caught in the pause between two movements of a dance. It is not the stiff, formal posture that ancient art usually gives to important figures. That is why it has fascinated people ever since it was found: a tiny bronze from 4,500 years ago that looks completely alive.

The bangles. They cover almost her entire left arm, from wrist to shoulder, with a few more on the right wrist — a stack, not a pair.

Where else in this chapter can you spot bangles worn in this manner? Turn back to the very first page of the chapter, page 85 — Fig. 6.1, the photograph of the North Gate entrance to Dholavira's ‘Castle’ area. The woman seated in the foreground, in a Kutchi dress, is wearing white bangles covering her whole forearm, exactly like the figurine. She is a living woman photographed a few years ago, sitting inside a Harappan city.

The ‘Dancing Girl’ (Fig. 6.15-4)The woman in Fig. 6.1, page 85
DateAbout 4,500 years ago, Mohenjo-daroToday, at Dholavira in Kutch, Gujarat
BanglesStacked from wrist to shoulder on one armStacked along the whole forearm
Still worn?Yes — “a practice still visible in parts of Gujarat and Rajasthan”, exactly the regions where Dholavira and Kalibangan stand

What conclusion should we draw? That Harappan culture did not die with the Harappan cities. The chapter's last paragraph says it in words — “much of the Harappan culture and technology survived and was passed on to the next phase of Indian civilisation” — and these two pictures say it in evidence. A custom of dress has been handed down, woman to woman, in the same part of India, for more than four thousand years.

Why this is a strong argument and not a coincidence: the resemblance is not vague. It is a specific way of wearing a specific ornament, and it survives in the same geographical region as the sites. Historians look for exactly this kind of triple match — same object, same practice, same place — before claiming continuity. Other examples in this chapter point the same way: the namaste figurine, the swastika seal, the thirsty-crow story, turmeric and ginger in the cooking pot, and the plough whose shape modern farmers still use.
Careful with one thing: the name ‘Dancing Girl’ was given by the archaeologists who found her, not by the Harappans. We do not actually know that she was a dancer — only that the pose suggests movement. Say “the figurine known as the ‘Dancing Girl’”, the way the book says the statuette is “often called ‘Priest King’ (although it is not known whose figure was this)”.
Was this helpful? Report an error