Yes — a decrease is an increase by a negative number, so no new identity is needed.
Take m = 1, n = –1 in Identity 1:
ab + (1) × b + a × (–1) + (1) × (–1)
= ab + b – a – 1
This is exactly the expression found earlier by direct expansion.
Book page 1406 Updated on2026-09-05
Yes — a decrease is an increase by a negative number, so no new identity is needed.
This is exactly the expression found earlier by direct expansion.
(i) Take m = –2, n = 3.
Direct check, keeping the subtraction: (a – 2)(b + 3) = a(b + 3) – 2(b + 3) = ab + 3a – 2b – 6 ✓
(ii) Take m = –3, n = –4.
Direct check: (a – 3)(b – 4) = a(b – 4) – 3(b – 4) = ab – 4a – 3b + 12 ✓
Multiply each term of the first bracket by each term of the second, letting the sign rules do the work.
Test (ii) at a = 7, u = 2, b = 9, v = 3: LHS = 5 × 6 = 30; RHS = 63 – 18 – 21 + 6 = 30 ✓
Distributivity is not limited to two terms inside a bracket — every term gets multiplied.
Now simplify each term using exponent notation:
Test at a = 2, b = 1: LHS = 3 × (2 – 1 + 0.2) = 3.6; RHS = 6 – 3 + 0.6 = 3.6 ✓