| Figure | Number of tiles | Seen as a difference of squares |
|---|---|---|
| Step 1 | 8 | 3² – 1² |
| Step 2 | 12 | 4² – 2² |
| Step 3 | 16 | 5² – 3² |
The counts go up by 4 each time: 8, 12, 16, …
Book page 1536 Updated on2026-09-05
| Figure | Number of tiles | Seen as a difference of squares |
|---|---|---|
| Step 1 | 8 | 3² – 1² |
| Step 2 | 12 | 4² – 2² |
| Step 3 | 16 | 5² – 3² |
The counts go up by 4 each time: 8, 12, 16, …
Identity 1C makes both instant:
Several ways of seeing the frame, all landing on the same expression.
| Way of seeing it | Expression | Simplified |
|---|---|---|
| Big square minus hole | (n + 2)² – n² | 4n + 4 |
| Four sides of length n + 1, no overlap | 4(n + 1) | 4n + 4 |
| Two full rows + two short columns | 2(n + 2) + 2n | 4n + 4 |
| Four sides of n tiles + four corners | 4n + 4 | 4n + 4 |
Check: n = 1 → 8 ✓, n = 2 → 12 ✓, n = 3 → 16 ✓, n = 10 → 44 ✓
Two students see it two ways, and both are right.
Tadang's method. The whole figure is a square of side (m + n), and the four rectangles each measure m by n.
Yusuf's method. The shaded part is itself a square. Along the top edge the big side m + n is covered by one rectangle's short side m followed by its long side n; the shaded square starts where that m ends and stops where the next rectangle's m begins, so its side is (m + n) – m – m = n – m.
The two expansions are the same expression, so the two methods agree — as they must, since they measure one region.
Test at m = 3, n = 7: (10)² – 4 × 21 = 100 – 84 = 16, and (7 – 3)² = 16 ✓
Each of the three rectangles measures x by y. The slanting region lies between the top and bottom bars, on either side of the middle bar.
Anusha's method. ABCD is the square of side x lying between the two bars; EFGH is the middle bar, x tall and y wide.
Vaishnavi's method. The whole outline PQSR has width x and height QS = y + x + y = x + 2y.
Aditya's method. The slanting region is two equal rectangles, one on each side of the middle bar, each x tall and (x – y)⁄2 wide.