NCERT Solutions Ganita Prakash (Part 2) Chapter 4 –97Views of solids built from cubes — Figure it Out

Book page 95 Updated on2026-09-05

Q1.
Draw the top view, front view and the side view of each of the following combinations of identical cubes.
Answer

The method. Write the solid down as a plan with heights — a small grid, one cell for each square of floor the solid stands on, with the number of cubes stacked there written in. Then each view is read off mechanically:

  • Top view — the plan itself: shade every cell where the height is at least 1.
  • Front view — for each column of the plan (left to right), draw a bar as tall as the largest height in that column.
  • Side view — for each row of the plan (front to back), draw a bar as tall as the largest height in that row.

The word largest is the whole trick: a view is a silhouette, so a tall stack hides everything shorter behind it.

Solid (i) — 3 cubes, all one layer high: two side by side at the front and one behind the right-hand cube.

Plan (front row at the bottom): back → 0 1 ; front → 1 1
Front view: a 2 × 1 rectangle
Top view: an L of 3 squares
Side view: a 2 × 1 rectangle (2 deep, 1 high)

Solid (ii) — 4 cubes: a one-cube-wide arm running two cubes back, with a two-cube column standing beside the back cube of the arm.

Plan with heights: back → 1 2 ; front → 1 0
Front view: L-shaped — left bar 1 high, right bar 2 high
Top view: an L of 3 squares
Side view: L-shaped — front 1 high, back 2 high

Solid (iii) — 4 cubes, all one layer high: a row of three at the back with one more sticking out in front of the left-hand end.

Plan: back → 1 1 1 ; front → 1 0 0
Front view: a 3 × 1 rectangle
Top view: the L-tetromino above
Side view: a 2 × 1 rectangle

Solid (iv) — 6 cubes: a 2 × 2 block of floor, the back row stacked 2 high and the front row 1 high (a two-step staircase).

Plan with heights: back → 2 2 ; front → 1 1
Front view: a 2 × 2 square (the back wall hides the front step)
Top view: a 2 × 2 square
Side view: a staircase — 1 high at the front, 2 high at the back

Solid (v) — 4 cubes, only one cube deep: a column of three with one cube joined to the middle one on the right.

Plan: a single row → 1 1 (heights 3 and 1)
Front view: the T shape itself — a bar of 3 with one square at its middle right
Top view: a 2 × 1 rectangle
Side view: a 1 × 3 rectangle (1 deep, 3 high)

Solid (vi) — the tallest of the six: a one-cube-high base with a notch cut into its front edge, a column rising two cubes above the base towards the back, and one further cube standing on the base at the right. Write its plan with heights straight off the picture in your book and then apply the three rules above; because the base has a notch, the top view has a bite taken out of it, and because the column rises two cubes, the front view is a stepped outline three cubes tall.

Why the front view of solid (iv) is a plain square: the back row is two cubes high and stands right behind the front row, so from the front the step is invisible. All the information about the step is in the side view. This is exactly why three views are taken and not one.
Check it yourself: the height shown in the front view must equal the height in the side view; the width in the front view must equal the width in the top view; and the depth in the top view must equal the depth in the side view. If any pair disagrees, one of your views is wrong.
Q2.
Imagine eight identical cubes, glued together along faces to form the letter 'C'. (i) This looks like a 'C' from the front. What does it look like from the side? From the top? (ii) Glue additional cubes to make a shape that looks like 'C' from the front and 'H' from the top. (iii) Now, can you glue even more cubes to make it look like 'C' from the front, 'H' from the top, and 'F' from the side? (iv) Can you think of other letter combinations to make with a single combination of cubes in this manner?
Answer

The C is 3 cubes wide, 4 cubes tall and just 1 cube deep: a row of 3 at the top, a row of 3 at the bottom, and one cube in the left-hand column on each of the two middle levels — 3 + 1 + 1 + 3 = 8 cubes.

(i) Because the whole letter is only one cube deep:

From the side: the depth is 1 and the height is 4 → a 1 × 4 column of squares
From the top: the width is 3 and the depth is 1 → a 3 × 1 row of squares

(ii) Making the top view an H. The top view is the plan of the solid, so we must add cubes behind the C to fill out an H-shaped floor plan. The trick is that the front view will not change as long as every new cube is placed at a height where that column of the C is already filled.

The bottom row of the C fills all 3 columns at the lowest level
So a cube may be added at the lowest level behind any of the 3 columns
Build the whole H on that ground layer → the top view becomes H, the front view is still C

(iii) Making the side view an F as well. Yes, it can be done, but now all three silhouettes must be satisfied at once. Think of it as a switch for each little cube position (x across, y deep, z high): put a cube there only if x–z is filled in the C, x–y is filled in the H and y–z is filled in the F. Then fill in whatever extra cubes are needed to make each of the three silhouettes complete.

Why the three letters must agree with each other: the front view and the top view share the width, the top view and the side view share the depth, and the front view and the side view share the height. So the C and the H must be equally wide, the H and the F equally deep, and the C and the F equally tall. If those numbers clash, no arrangement of cubes can work — no amount of gluing will fix a disagreement about size.

(iv) Other combinations. Any three letters that agree on the shared dimensions and whose shadows can be met at the same time. Easy ones to try:

  • L, L, L — three L-shaped views; a natural corner shape does this.
  • T, T, I — a T-shaped slab standing in a T-shaped plan.
  • I, O, I — a plain cuboid gives simple rectangular views.
  • Letters made of straight strokes (E, F, H, I, L, T) are much easier than round ones (O, S, C-with-curves), because a silhouette made of cubes can only have square corners.
Q3.
Which solid corresponds to the given top view, front view, and side view?
Answer

Reconstruct the solid from the three views instead of guessing, then compare with the seven pictures.

Step 1 — read the sizes. The top view is 2 squares wide and 3 squares deep, the front view is 2 wide and 3 tall, and the side view is 3 deep and 3 tall. So the solid fits in a box 2 wide × 3 deep × 3 high, and the shared dimensions agree.

Step 2 — write the plan. The top view is an L: both cells of the back row and both of the middle row are filled, but in the front row only the left-hand cell is filled.

back row: 1 1
middle row: 1 1
front row: 1 0

Step 3 — put in the heights. The side view says that exactly one of the three depths reaches 3 cubes high and the other two are only 1 cube high; and since that tall part is at one end of the side view, it is the back row. The front view says the left column reaches 3 and the right column reaches 2. Both of these can only happen in the back row, so:

back row heights: 3 (left) and 2 (right)
middle row heights: 1 and 1
front row heights: 1 and —
Total cubes = 3 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 8

So the solid is: a flat L-shaped base one cube high (two cells across the back, two across the middle, one at the front left), with two more cubes stacked on the back-left cell and one more on the back-right cell. It is the picture that shows a three-cube-high step at the back left, a two-cube-high column beside it, and a single layer running forward — and no slot or hole cut into the front, since our plan has none.

Why the reconstruction is forced: the top view fixes which cells are used; the front and side views each give a set of maximum heights. Wherever a column and a row both demand a large height, the cube must sit where they cross. Here the two demands cross in only one place, so there is exactly one solid — the seven pictures differ from one another precisely in where their notches and steps are.
Check it yourself: take your reconstructed solid and read its three views back off it. If any one of them disagrees with the printed picture, the reconstruction is wrong.
Q4.
Using identical cubes, make a solid that gives the following projections.
Answer

Only one view is given in each part, and one view never fixes a solid. So there are many correct answers — the task is to build any solid with the given silhouette.

The easy general recipe. Whatever the given shape is, build it one cube thick:

If the given view is aBuild
Top viewA flat slab, one cube high, standing exactly on those cells
Front viewA flat wall, one cube deep, with cubes in exactly those positions
Side viewA flat wall, one cube wide, with cubes in exactly those positions

So for parts (i), (iv) and (vii), which give top views, lay the cubes flat on the table in exactly the pattern shown. For (ii), (v) and (viii), which give front views, stand a one-cube-thick wall up in that pattern. For (iii), (vi) and (ix), which give side views, do the same but facing sideways.

Why this always works, and why other answers work too: a one-cube-thick model has no hidden cubes at all, so its silhouette in that direction is exactly the shape drawn. But you may also thicken the model in the direction you are looking along — adding cubes directly behind existing ones changes nothing about that view. Solid (iii) and (ix) even show dashed lines, the draughtsman’s way of marking an edge that is hidden behind something; those tell you that in the intended model something is indeed tucked away behind.
Check it yourself: after building, hold the model up against a lamp and look at its shadow from the stated direction. The shadow should be exactly the printed shape — the same squares, no more and no fewer.
Q5.
Find the number of cubes in this stack of identical cubes.
Answer

20 cubes.

Count what you can see first: the front row has 4 cubes, the row above it 3, then 2, then 1 at the top — that is 10 visible cubes. But each of those upper rows is set one step further back as well as one step higher, so nothing is holding them up unless there are cubes hidden underneath. Those hidden cubes must be counted too.

Work depth by depth, from the front of the stack backwards:

Row (from the front)Cubes acrossCubes highCubes in that row
1st414
2nd326
3rd236
4th144
Total = 4 + 6 + 6 + 4 = 20 cubes
Visible = 4 + 3 + 2 + 1 = 10, hidden = 10
Why the hidden cubes have to be there: a cube cannot float. The single cube at the top sits on one below it, which sits on another, and so on down to the table — four cubes in that back column, of which only the top one can be seen. The same reasoning fills in the columns of the second and third rows. Exactly half of this stack is out of sight, which is why counting only what your eye can see gives the wrong answer.
Tip: With stacks like this, always work out the plan with heights first — a small grid of numbers saying how many cubes stand on each square of the table. Then add up the numbers. It is far more reliable than counting cubes in a picture.
Q6.
What are the different shapes the projection of a cube can make under different orientations?
Answer

Three families of shapes: a square, a rectangle, and a hexagon — including a regular hexagon.

How the cube is heldProjection
A face facing the plane squarelyA square, side equal to the edge
Turned about one edge direction onlyA rectangle — one side stays the edge length, the other stretches up to edge × √2
In a general slanting positionA hexagon (not regular)
Balanced on a corner, looking along the body diagonalA regular hexagon
square rectangle regular hexagon
The three kinds of outline a cube can cast. The dashed lines show the three edges meeting at the near corner in the hexagonal case.

Why the hexagon comes out regular. Stand the cube on one corner so that the body diagonal is vertical. Turning the cube through 120° about that diagonal sends each of the three edges at the bottom corner to the next one — so the three of them are interchangeable, and their projections must be equal in length and spaced 120° apart. With an edge of 1 unit:

Component of an edge along the diagonal = 1⁄√3
Component across the diagonal = √(1 − 1⁄3) = √(2⁄3) ≈ 0.816
Six such equal sides at 60° to one another ⇒ a regular hexagon of side √(2⁄3)
Why the outline is always centrally symmetric: a cube has a centre, and every face has an opposite face parallel to it. So every edge of the outline has an opposite edge parallel and equal to it — which is why you get a square, a rectangle or a hexagon, and never a triangle or a pentagon.
Was this helpful? Report an error