NCERT Solutions Exploring Society: India and Beyond Chapter 2 Resistance to the Delhi Sultanate — THINK ABOUT IT

Book page 29 Updated on2026-09-05

Q1.
Do you think it would have been an easy task to bring together 75 leaders in those days?
Answer

No — and the difficulty is exactly what makes the achievement worth recording. Bringing 75 chieftains into one confederacy in the 14th century meant solving at least four problems, none of them military.

  1. Reaching them at all. There was no way to send a message faster than a rider could travel, through forest, hill and river country in what is now Telangana. A single round of consultation among 75 chiefs would have taken weeks, and every message could be intercepted.
  2. Persuading rivals to stand together. Each chieftain had his own territory, his own armed men and his own revenue — and, very often, an old quarrel with the chieftain next door. Every one of them had to be convinced that the Tughlaq threat was more dangerous than his neighbour.
  3. Agreeing who leads. A confederacy needs one commander in the field. That means 74 leaders accepting a place below one of their equals — which in a warrior society costs prestige, and prestige was the basis of a chief's authority at home.
  4. Risking everything on it. Joining an alliance against the Sultanate meant being marked for retaliation. Anyone who joined and then saw the confederacy collapse would face Delhi's army alone.
Why it worked anyway: the Musunuri Nayakas, Telugu chieftains themselves, had the standing to call others together, and they built the alliance in stages — the confederacy first “defeated smaller provinces”, and each success made the next chief easier to persuade. Nothing recruits like winning. The result was that they defeated the Delhi Sultanate forces and expelled Muhammad bin Tughlaq's army from Warangal around 1330–1336.
Connect it up: compare this with what happened on the other side in 1565. The Deccan Sultanates were five separate states that normally fought each other — Bijapur, Golconda, Berar, Ahmednagar and Bidar — and Vijayanagara had survived largely because they stayed divided. The moment they “formed a coalition”, Vijayanagara lost at Talikota. In this period, the ability to combine was often worth more than the size of any single army.
Was this helpful? Report an error